What Are Proof of Work and Proof of Stake?
Content
- Proof-of-work: High energy consumption and a big carbon footprint
- Proof of stake vs. proof of work: key differences between these methods of verifying cryptocurrency transactions
- Rev. Proc. 2024-28: How Bitwave Simplifies Compliance for New Cost Basis Reporting Rules
- What Is the Difference Between Proof of Work and Proof of Stake?
New https://www.xcritical.com/ projects with groundbreaking technology seem to pop up out of nowhere, only to disappear again a few months later. Yet above it all, Ethereum stays ahead of the game with a stalwart presence, consistently driving innovation and development. The cost required to maintain PoW-based infrastructure can make it unaffordable. It has been argued that the Bitcoin architecture consumes as much energy as some of the world’s biggest residential and industrial cities. Therefore, a relatively cost- and energy-efficient mining solution was needed as a substitute to PoW. The two most popular types of consensus mechanism are proof of work and proof of stake.
Proof-of-work: High energy consumption and a big carbon footprint
Although the PoS system achieves a reduction in electricity bills, some unintended side effects are that it can promote coin hoarding (rather than spending) and centralization. Being a time-tested model for securing public blockchains means that PoW will likely continue to play a key role as the industry onboards more mainstream audiences. Rather than supersede the legacy mobile pow system consensus model, newer systems highlight the unique properties of PoW and make it more attractive to investors that prioritize security and censorship resistance. A Braiins study puts the conservative cost of attacking the Bitcoin network through physical hashrate at $5.5 billion. However, such an operation is impractical to execute in the real world because the cost attack outweighs any perceived benefits.
Proof of stake vs. proof of work: key differences between these methods of verifying cryptocurrency transactions
Currently, Bitcoin mining consumes more energy on an annual basis than the country of Kazakhstan and slightly less than the Netherlands. Proof of work and proof of stake are both consensus mechanisms that “…help blockchains synchronize data and remain secure. These algorithms determine which node (computer) in the network can add the next block of transactions to the chain. Both mechanisms have proven to be successful at maintaining blockchains, though they each have trade-offs.” Before diving into the pros and cons of each consensus mechanism, let’s analyze their background and functionality. Proof-of-Work (PoW) is a consensus mechanism in the blockchain that enables miners to add a new block to the network based on calculations performed to discover the perfect hash.
Rev. Proc. 2024-28: How Bitwave Simplifies Compliance for New Cost Basis Reporting Rules
Proof of stake validators, on the other hand, can operate for years using very basic computer systems. The mining process for Decred begins with nodes (computers that participate in the network) looking for a solution to a cryptographic puzzle with a known difficulty level in order to create a new block. Miners win the reward when they guess a hash that falls below the threshold provided by the network. Once a miner finds the valid block hash, it broadcasts this information to other miners who can quickly validate and add the new block to their blockchain copies. This validation process eliminates the possibility of miners including malicious transactions, such as an attempt by a user to double-spend coins.
Proof of work is the original crypto consensus mechanism, first used by Bitcoin. The winner gets to update the blockchain with the most recent verified transactions and is paid with a set amount of cryptocurrency by the network. The latter, by contrast, may favor large holders of cryptocurrency, who may often be early adopters and who may ensure that the corresponding blockchain is developed in a certain way.
However, these machines don’t do hashing, and simply produce and process blocks of transactions that represent smart contract computations. The reason that combined node machines must be built to the same standardized specification, is that rather than compete to perform hashing, they must try not to “statistically deviate” by producing more or less blocks. In essence, rather than trying to perform more computation, they try to perform the same amount of computation, and can be punished for deviating from the group. Proof-of-useful-work (PoUW) is the Internet Computer’s answer to these kinds of considerations, and is more complex than the foregoing schemes. It involves a blockchain being produced by dedicated hardware called “node machines” that are of very similar, standardized specification.
The proof of stake mechanism is different from the proof of work mechanism in that significantly less computing power is needed to validate a proof of stake transaction. In fact, proof of stake transactions can be validated with a computer that has as little as 8 GB of RAM. This results in a drastic reduction in energy consumption per transaction and for proof of stake blockchain networks as a whole. Like proof of work, proof of stake is also a consensus mechanism used by blockchain networks for transaction verification. However, instead of using computer power to verify transactions, the proof of stake method uses staking, a process similar to bidding or escrow.
Proof-of-stake systems require only a small initial investment to participate, making them more vulnerable to attack. Validators who engage in the proof-of-stake model only have to spend money once to participate – they must purchase tokens to win blocks in the proof-of-stake model. A miner in a proof-of-work system, on the other hand, must buy mining equipment and keep it operating indefinitely, incurring variable energy expenses. Other crypto mining problems include censorship and traceability, which have already occurred in places like China, where cryptocurrency mining has been banned. Electricity readings or even thermal cameras might be used to locate the massive power use.
For the block to be confirmed, a crypto miner must generate a target hash that’s less than or equal to that of the block. However, they pay their operating expenses, such as electricity and rent, with fiat currency. So what’s really happening is that miners exchange energy for cryptocurrency, which causes PoW mining to use as much energy as some small countries.
In the case of bitcoin, the database is known as a blockchain, and the blockchain is secured by the consensus mechanism. Proof of work (PoW) is a form of adding new blocks of transactions to a cryptocurrency’s blockchain. The work, in this case, is generating a hash (a long string of characters) that matches the target hash for the current block. The crypto miner who does this wins the right to add that block to the blockchain and receive rewards.
Remember that crypto runs on blockchains, which are like giant spreadsheets that keep track of transactions (e.g., John sent Jane 0.01 bitcoin), as well as who owns how much cryptocurrency. Blockchains are updated in groups of transactions, and these transactions are added to their respective blockchains by millions of individuals or companies running special computers. The owners of these computers are paid by the blockchain in the cryptocurrency that they are updating. Another issue that concerns some is that the staking mechanic encourages centralization because users with more tokens have a better chance of being selected as validators. However, it depends on the design of the blockchain—Decred pays both its miners and pseudo-random voters. The PoW consensus algorithm aims to provide a stable economy by regulating the coin’s issuance using the difficulty adjustment implementation.
As discussed above, proof of work relies on the contribution of miners to validate transactions. A particular transaction is validated when a miner uses computer power to solve a complex algorithmic problem. Only the first miner to solve the computational puzzle is rewarded with native coin. In order to compete, miners use high-powered computers that require significant energy to function properly. Supporters believe proof of work is more decentralized than other consensus mechanisms. One argument from this perspective is that there are practical limits to how much mining power one can acquire in a proof of work system.
When a miner’s computer guesses the correct password, a block is added to the blockchain, the transaction is validated, and the winning miner collects a reward of native coin. Proof-of-stake is a consensus mechanism for cryptocurrencies that allows for the processing of transactions and the creation of new blocks on a blockchain. A consensus mechanism is a way of validating entries in a distributed database while also keeping it safe.
They send this information through a hashing algorithm, attempting to meet a target value (much like Bitcoin’s proof-of-work). When a node generates a hash that meets the requirement, the network sends it to other nodes to compare the information contained in the block. When the block is validated by all online stakeholders, the semi-randomly chosen validators (who are stakeholders) sign the block, and the last to do so appends transactions to it. For example, Bitmain, one of the largest manufacturers of cryptocurrency mining hardware, controlled several mining pools that had more than 43% of the hashing power in 2018.
- The oldest of the two is proof of work, which is utilized by Bitcoin, Ethereum 1.0, and many other cryptocurrencies.
- Proof-of-work and proof-of-stake are two algorithmic methods that blockchain networks use to validate transactions.
- A proof removes the need to trust that others are acting honestly because it is code.
- The main difference between proof-of-work and proof-of-stake is the difficulty requirement.
- Proof of stake requires collateral in the form of staked cryptocurrency to become a trusted participant.
- Proof of work and proof of stake are two different consensus mechanisms for cryptocurrency, but there are important differences between them.
The proof-of-stake algorithm chooses a validator in a fraction of the time it takes the proof-of-work approach, allowing for faster transaction rates. The most valid criticism of the bitcoin network’s resource use is electronic waste. Proof-of-work miners often run at full power 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Poor conditions, such as humidity, high temperatures, and insufficient ventilation, can have an influence on mining facilities and reduce equipment lifespan.
Proof-of-work serves multiple essential purposes within the blockchain ecosystem. Firstly, it ensures the distributed consensus required for validating transactions and maintaining a single version of the truth across the network. Secondly, it acts as a deterrent against malicious actors attempting to manipulate the system by requiring significant computational resources and energy expenditure. Lastly, PoW serves as an incentive mechanism, rewarding miners with newly minted cryptocurrency tokens for their computational efforts.
The network awards the winner a predetermined quantity of cryptocurrency for updating the blockchain with the most recent transactions that have been verified. It has attracted enormous computing power, which keeps it ahead of any would-be attackers. However, if the Bitcoin blockchain network is ever reduced in capacity, such as will likely occur when the difficulty gets too high or the last bitcoin is rewarded, the blockchain will become vulnerable. Participants will abandon it because the promise of profits will be much lower than they are today. Where PoW requires miners to put in the work to extend the blockchain, proof-of-stake (PoS) adopts an entirely different tack. PoS requires validators to stake their ETH to create new blocks and validate transactions instead.
Since miners have invested significant resources in the computer equipment and energy costs required, they’re motivated to accurately validate transactions. By incentivizing miners to verify the integrity of new crypto transactions before adding them to the distributed ledger that is blockchain, proof of work helps prevent double spending. Cryptocurrencies do not have centralized gatekeepers to verify the accuracy of new transactions and data that are added to the blockchain. Instead, they rely on a distributed network of participants to validate incoming transactions and add them as new blocks on the chain. Miners race to be the first to generate a target hash that’s below the block hash.
Because minable cryptocurrency has market value, businesses have emerged and overtaken most of the computational power used by proof of work blockchains. For each group of transactions, the blockchain randomly chooses one person with staked cryptocurrency to update the ledger. So while proof of work relies on competition, proof of stake operates more like a lottery system.